﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs><title>Home </title><atom:link href="http://waltschmidt.com/Rss.aspx?ContentID=1951047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><itunes:author>waltschmidt.com</itunes:author><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Walt Schmidt</itunes:name></itunes:owner><link>http://waltschmidt.com</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:04:58 GMT</pubDate><description>Home </description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 23:22:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>How many browsers can you support?</title><link>http://waltschmidt.com/how-many-browsers-can-you-support</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><itunes:author>Walt Schmidt</itunes:author><dc:creator>Walt Schmidt</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<p>With the rapid release cycles of Firefox and Chrome, along with the yearly upgrade of Internet Explorer, there's always something new to support. But Paul Irish makes the case that it's not the frequency to be concerned with, but rather the&nbsp;browser half-life.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://paulirish.com/2011/browser-market-pollution-iex-is-the-new-ie6/">Browser Market Pollution: IE[x] is the new IE6</a></strong></p>]]></description><guid>http://waltschmidt.com/how-many-browsers-can-you-support</guid></item></channel></rss>